DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Cadillac CTS vs 2007 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeAlpina
CTSModelB3
2007Model year2007
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
226 km/hTop speed244 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
215 HPPower214 HP
262 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank63 lt
17 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size245/40 R18ZR
YesABS—

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4580 mm
1795 mmWidth1782 mm
1441 mmHeight1395 mm
1705 KgWeight—
2880 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Cadillac CTS and 2007 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…