DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Cadillac CTS vs 2007 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeSubaru
CTSModelForester
2007Model year2007
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h6,3 s
223 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2597 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
181 HPPower211 HP
245 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption15 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4450 mm
1795 mmWidth1735 mm
1441 mmHeight1585 mm
1625 KgWeight1455 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Cadillac CTS and 2007 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…