DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Cadillac CTS vs 2006 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeVolvo
CTSModelC70
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeCoupe - Cabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
223 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2597 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
181 HPPower220 HP
245 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4582 mm
1795 mmWidth1820 mm
1441 mmHeight1400 mm
1625 KgWeight1651 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Cadillac CTS and 2006 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…