DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Cadillac CTS vs 2004 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac CTS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Cadillac CTSSpecificationAudi A6
CadillacMakeAudi
CTSModelA6
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Cadillac CTSSpecificationAudi A6
9,3 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
223 km/hTop speed203 km/h
2597 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
181 HPPower163 HP
245 NmTorque310 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Cadillac CTSSpecificationAudi A6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption12 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Cadillac CTSSpecificationAudi A6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Cadillac CTSSpecificationAudi A6
4828 mmLength4810 mm
1795 mmWidth1852 mm
1441 mmHeight1551 mm
1625 KgWeight1815 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2757 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Cadillac CTS and 2004 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac CTS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…