DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Cadillac CT6 vs 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Range Rover

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

85.75–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeLand Rover
CT6ModelRange Rover
2016Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3649 ccEngine displacement3628 cc
340 HPPower271 HP
385 NmTorque630 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank105 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,2 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
8 Hydra-MaticGears6
235/50 R18; 245/45 R19; 245/40 R20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5184 mmLength4972 mm
1879 mmWidth—
1472 mmHeight1865 mm
1781 KgWeight—
3109 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Cadillac CT6 and 2012 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…