DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Cadillac Catera vs 2001 Mercury Sable Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeMercury
CateraModelSable
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
204 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
203 HPPower203 HP
260 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 HR16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4930 mmLength5070 mm
1790 mmWidth1850 mm
1430 mmHeight1410 mm
1710 KgWeight1545 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Cadillac Catera and 2001 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…