DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Cadillac Catera vs 1998 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeFord
CateraModelTaurus
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
204 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
203 HPPower203 HP
260 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank61 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 HR16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4930 mmLength5070 mm
1790 mmWidth1854 mm
1430 mmHeight1463 mm
1710 KgWeight1602 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Cadillac Catera and 1998 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…