DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Cadillac Brougham vs 1996 Ford Expedition Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeFord
BroughamModelExpedition
1992Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
197 km/hTop speed180 km/h
5733 ccEngine displacement5398 cc
188 HPPower232 HP
407 NmTorque441 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank98 lt
20 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
14 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/70 R15Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5615 mmLength5200 mm
1940 mmWidth2000 mm
1460 mmHeight1900 mm
1940 KgWeight—
3085 mmWheelbase3020 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Cadillac Brougham and 1996 Ford Expedition approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…