DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Cadillac BLS vs 2004 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeVolvo
BLSModelS60
2008Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
235 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2319 cc
210 HPPower250 HP
300 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank70 lt
12 ltUrban consumption12,7 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4576 mm
1752 mmWidth1804 mm
1471 mmHeight1428 mm
—Weight1537 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Cadillac BLS and 2004 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…