DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Cadillac BLS vs 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeMitsubishi
BLSModelLancer
2007Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
235 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
210 HPPower280 HP
300 NmTorque383 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
12 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4490 mm
1752 mmWidth1770 mm
1471 mmHeight1450 mm
—Weight1320 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Cadillac BLS and 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…