DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Cadillac BLS vs 2010 Alfa Romeo 159 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 159

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeAlfa Romeo
BLSModel159
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h7,7 s
220 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1742 cc
175 HPPower200 HP
265 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size225/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 ZR19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4660 mm
1752 mmWidth1828 mm
1471 mmHeight1417-1422 mm
—Weight1430 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Cadillac BLS and 2010 Alfa Romeo 159 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 159 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…