DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Cadillac BLS vs 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeMitsubishi
BLSModelLancer
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
220 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
175 HPPower240 HP
265 NmTorque309 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size205/60 R16; 215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4585 mm
1752 mmWidth1760 mm
1471 mmHeight1515 mm
2675 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Cadillac BLS and 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…