DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Cadillac BLS vs 2006 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac BLS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi A3
CadillacMakeAudi
BLSModelA3
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi A3
8,7 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
220 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
175 HPPower140 HP
265 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi A3
4680 mmLength4214 mm
1752 mmWidth1765 mm
1471 mmHeight1421 mm
—Weight1330 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Cadillac BLS and 2006 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac BLS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…