2026 • Polestar
2
Polestar Polestar 2 Long Range Single Motor 2026Overall Score92.13/100
2026 Polestar 2 vs 2025 XPeng G9 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2025 • XPeng
G9
XPeng G9 Long Range 2025Overall Score91.74/100
WINNER
Polestar 2
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.39 points.
92.13–91.74
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Polestar 2SpecificationXPeng G9
PolestarMakeXPeng
2ModelG9
2026Model year2025
FastbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Polestar 2SpecificationXPeng G9
6,2 s0–100 km/h6,4 s
205 km/hTop speed200 km/h
223 kWEngine displacement233 kW
299 HPPower313 HP
490 NmTorque430 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Polestar 2SpecificationXPeng G9
ElectricFuel typeElectric
82 kWhFuel tank98 kWh
16,3 kWh/100 kmUrban consumption18,2 kWh/100 km
14,3 kWh/100 kmExtra-urban consumption16,2 kWh/100 km
15,3 kWh/100 kmAverage consumption17,2 kWh/100 km
Transmission & Chassis
Polestar 2SpecificationXPeng G9
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
ATTransmissionAT
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Polestar 2SpecificationXPeng G9
4606 mmLength4891 mm
1859 mmWidth1937 mm
1479 mmHeight1680 mm
2009 kgWeight2275 kg
407 ltLuggage capacity660 lt
2736 mmWheelbase2998 mm
Additional Features
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2026 Polestar 2 and 2025 XPeng G9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Polestar 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.39 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…