DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Cadillac BLS vs 2014 Volkswagen Scirocco Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac BLS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeVolkswagen
BLSModelScirocco
2009Model year2014
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
230 km/hTop speed233 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
210 HPPower211 HP
300 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—TransmissionDSG
225/45 R17Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4256 mm
1752 mmWidth1810 mm
1471 mmHeight1404 mm
—Weight1393 kg
—Luggage capacity292 lt
2675 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Volkswagen SciroccoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistAuto HoldTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing Camera

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Cadillac BLS and 2014 Volkswagen Scirocco approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac BLS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…