DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Cadillac BLS vs 2013 Peugeot RCZ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac BLS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakePeugeot
BLSModelRCZ
2009Model year2013
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
230 km/hTop speed237 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
210 HPPower200 HP
300 NmTorque275 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—TransmissionManual
225/45 R17Tyre size18
YesABSNo

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4287 mm
1752 mmWidth2107 mm
1471 mmHeight1362 mm
—Weight1297 kg
—Luggage capacity321 lt
2675 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Cadillac BLS and 2013 Peugeot RCZ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac BLS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…