DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Cadillac BLS vs 2010 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeLand Rover
BLSModelFreelander
2009Model year2010
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
210 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
150 HPPower190 HP
320 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank68 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4500 mm
1752 mmWidth—
1471 mmHeight1740 mm
—Weight1805 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Cadillac BLS and 2010 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…