DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Cadillac BLS vs 2009 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi A3
CadillacMakeAudi
BLSModelA3
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi A3
9,8 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
210 km/hTop speed238 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower200 HP
320 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi A3
DieselFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi A3
4680 mmLength4238 mm
1752 mmWidth1765 mm
1471 mmHeight1421 mm
—Weight1295 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Cadillac BLS and 2009 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…