DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Cadillac BLS vs 2009 Alpina D3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina D3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeAlpina
BLSModelD3
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
210 km/hTop speed244 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower214 HP
320 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank61 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size245/40 R18ZR; 265/40 R18ZR
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4545 mm
1752 mmWidth1817 mm
1471 mmHeight1413 mm
—Weight1555 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Cadillac BLS and 2009 Alpina D3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina D3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…