DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Cadillac BLS vs 2006 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi TT
CadillacMakeAudi
BLSModelTT
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi TT
9,8 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
210 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower200 HP
320 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi TT
DieselFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi TT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Cadillac BLSSpecificationAudi TT
4680 mmLength4178 mm
1752 mmWidth1842 mm
1471 mmHeight1352 mm
—Weight1260 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Cadillac BLS and 2006 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…