DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Cadillac ATS vs 2014 Volvo V70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeVolvo
ATSModelV70
2013Model year2014
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
205 HPPower215 HP
259 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,0 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 Hydra-MaticGears6
225/45 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength4814 mm
1805 mmWidth1907 mm
1421 mmHeight1547 mm
1505 KgWeight—
2775 mmWheelbase2816 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Cadillac ATS and 2014 Volvo V70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…