DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Cadillac ATS vs 2013 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeFord
ATSModelMondeo
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,1 s
0 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
205 HPPower200 HP
259 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 Hydra-MaticGears6
225/45 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength4784 mm
1805 mmWidth1886 mm
1421 mmHeight1500 mm
1505 KgWeight1599 Kg
2775 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Cadillac ATS and 2013 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…