DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2026 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2025 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.48 points.

92.61–93.09
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
Range RoverModelCX-5
2026Model year2025
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
300 HPPower256 HP
650 NmTorque434 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
101 ltFuel tank58 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,8 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
ATTransmissionAT
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5052 mmLength4575 mm
2047 mmWidth2116 mm
1870 mmHeight1684 mm
—Weight1764 kg
—Luggage capacity871 lt
2997 mmWheelbase2698 mm

Additional Features

Land Rover Range RoverEBAEmergency Braking SystemPanoramic CeilingElectric Memory SeatsApple CarPlay / Android AutoRear Seat Entertainment System (11.4")Electric Retractable Door HandlesTailgate Event Suite (Optional)
Mazda CX-5Lane Departure Warning System (LDWS)Smart City Brake Support Front (SCBS-F)paddle shifterglass ceiling10.25" screenWireless CarPlay/Android Autogloss black grilleLarge diameter exhaust

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2026 Land Rover Range Rover and 2025 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.48 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…