1998 • Buick
Skylark
Buick Skylark 3.1 i V6 (162 Hp) 1998Overall Score64.5/100
1998 Buick Skylark vs 1998 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 3.1 V6 (141 Hp) 1998Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Oldsmobile Cutlass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick SkylarkSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
BuickMakeOldsmobile
SkylarkModelCutlass
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Buick SkylarkSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
3136 ccEngine displacement3135 cc
162 HPPower141 HP
251 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Buick SkylarkSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Buick SkylarkSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
185/75 R14 HTyre size195/75 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Buick SkylarkSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4804 mmLength4900 mm
1746 mmWidth1805 mm
1355 mmHeight1350 mm
1330 KgWeight1445 Kg
2627 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Buick Skylark and 1998 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…