1997 • Buick
Skylark
Buick Skylark 3.1 i V6 (162 Hp) 1997Overall Score64.5/100
1997 Buick Skylark vs 1997 Ford Aerostar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Ford
Aerostar
Ford Aerostar 3.0i V6 (147 Hp) 1997Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Ford Aerostar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick SkylarkSpecificationFord Aerostar
BuickMakeFord
SkylarkModelAerostar
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Buick SkylarkSpecificationFord Aerostar
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
3136 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
162 HPPower147 HP
251 NmTorque224 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Buick SkylarkSpecificationFord Aerostar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Buick SkylarkSpecificationFord Aerostar
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/75 R14 HTyre size205/75 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Buick SkylarkSpecificationFord Aerostar
4804 mmLength4440 mm
1746 mmWidth1820 mm
1355 mmHeight1850 mm
1330 KgWeight1530 Kg
2627 mmWheelbase3020 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Buick Skylark and 1997 Ford Aerostar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…