2000 • Buick
Skylark
Buick Skylark 3.1 i V6 (158 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
2000 Buick Skylark vs 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 3.1 V6 (162 Hp) 1999Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Buick Skylark
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick SkylarkSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
BuickMakeOldsmobile
SkylarkModelCutlass
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Buick SkylarkSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3136 ccEngine displacement3136 cc
158 HPPower162 HP
251 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Buick SkylarkSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank63 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Buick SkylarkSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
195/70 R14 STyre size185/75 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Buick SkylarkSpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4805 mmLength4892 mm
1732 mmWidth1766 mm
1360 mmHeight1375 mm
1345 KgWeight1392 Kg
2627 mmWheelbase2664 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Buick Skylark and 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Skylark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…