2000 • Buick
Skylark
Buick Skylark 3.1 i V6 (156 Hp) 2000Overall Score69.25/100
2000 Buick Skylark vs 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Challenger
Mitsubishi Challenger 2.8 TD (140 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Buick Skylark
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick SkylarkSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
BuickMakeMitsubishi
SkylarkModelChallenger
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Buick SkylarkSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
175 km/hTop speed155 km/h
3130 ccEngine displacement2835 cc
156 HPPower140 HP
251 NmTorque314 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Buick SkylarkSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
57 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Buick SkylarkSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Buick SkylarkSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
4790 mmLength4530 mm
1730 mmWidth1775 mm
1360 mmHeight1730 mm
1355 KgWeight1850 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Buick Skylark and 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Skylark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…