2000 • Buick
Skylark
Buick Skylark 3.1 i V6 (156 Hp) 2000Overall Score69.25/100
2000 Buick Skylark vs 1999 Mercury Sable Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mercury
Sable
Mercury Sable 3.0 V6 (157 Hp) 1999Overall Score68.25/100
WINNER
Buick Skylark
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
69.25–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick SkylarkSpecificationMercury Sable
BuickMakeMercury
SkylarkModelSable
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Buick SkylarkSpecificationMercury Sable
175 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3130 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
156 HPPower157 HP
251 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Buick SkylarkSpecificationMercury Sable
PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Buick SkylarkSpecificationMercury Sable
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
195/70 R14Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Buick SkylarkSpecificationMercury Sable
4790 mmLength5070 mm
1730 mmWidth1850 mm
1360 mmHeight1410 mm
1355 KgWeight1515 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2760 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Buick Skylark and 1999 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Skylark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…