DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Buick Skylark vs 1996 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Skylark

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeMazda
SkylarkModel626
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2260 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
152 HPPower165 HP
196 NmTorque217 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
195/70 R14 STyre size205/55 R15 88V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4695 mm
1746 mmWidth1750 mm
1360 mmHeight1390 mm
1337 KgWeight1275 Kg
2627 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Buick Skylark and 1996 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Skylark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…