2025 • Mazda
CX-30
Mazda CX-30 Centre-Line 2.5 e-Skyactiv G 140 AT 2025Overall Score70.77/100
2025 Mazda CX-30 vs 2026 Citroen Jumper Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2026 • Citroen
Jumper
Citroen Jumper 2.2 BlueHDi 140 HP 4.2T (15m³) 2026Overall Score70.1/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-30
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.67 points.
70.77–70.1
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CX-30SpecificationCitroen Jumper
MazdaMakeCitroen
CX-30ModelJumper
2025Model year2026
SUVBody typePanelvan
5Seats—
5Doors—
Performance
Mazda CX-30SpecificationCitroen Jumper
10,3 s0–100 km/h18,7 s
191 km/hTop speed90 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2200 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
238 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CX-30SpecificationCitroen Jumper
Petrol & ElectricFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank90 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CX-30SpecificationCitroen Jumper
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
ATTransmissionMT
—Tyre size225/75 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CX-30SpecificationCitroen Jumper
4395 mmLength6363 mm
2040 mmWidth2050 mm
1540 mmHeight2522 mm
1537 kgWeight2275 kg
430 ltLuggage capacity15000 lt
2655 mmWheelbase4035 mm
Additional Features
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2025 Mazda CX-30 and 2026 Citroen Jumper approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.67 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…