DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Alfa Romeo 164 vs 1996 Toyota Cresta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 164

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.5–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeToyota
164ModelCresta
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h—
202 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
125 HPPower97 HP
288 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4565 mmLength4750 mm
1760 mmWidth1755 mm
1390 mmHeight1420 mm
1490 KgWeight—
2660 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Alfa Romeo 164 and 1996 Toyota Cresta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 164 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…