DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2023 Dacia Spring vs 2018 FAW Besturn X40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn X40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

57.75–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaciaMakeFAW
SpringModelBesturn X40
2023Model year2018
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h—
125 km/hTop speed160 km/h
48 kWEngine displacement0 cc
65 HPPower0 HP
113 NmTorque320 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

ElectricFuel typeElectric
24 kWhFuel tank0 lt
146,2 kWh/100 kmUrban consumption—
144,2 kWh/100 kmExtra-urban consumption—
145,2 kWh/100 kmAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
ATTransmission—
—Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3734 mmLength4315 mm
1579 mmWidth1780 mm
1513 mmHeight1655 mm
975 kgWeight1580 Kg
290 ltLuggage capacity—
2423 mmWheelbase2600 mm

Additional Features

Dacia SpringAutomatic HeadlightsDriver and front passenger airbagsCopper color interior decorative design detailsElectric side mirrorsAUX inputUSB connectionY signature taillightsRoof bars in black/copper color

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2023 Dacia Spring and 2018 FAW Besturn X40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn X40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…