DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 ZAZ Chance vs 2012 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ Chance

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakeRenault
ChanceModelKangoo
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
172 km/hTop speed151 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
85 HPPower75 HP
130 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4237 mmLength4213 mm
1679 mmWidth1829 mm
1432 mmHeight1839 mm
1197 KgWeight1394 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2697 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 ZAZ Chance and 2012 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ Chance leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…