DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 ZAZ Chance vs 2012 Ford B-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ Chance

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakeFord
ChanceModelB-Max
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h15,1 s
172 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
85 HPPower75 HP
130 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank47 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption4,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,6 lt
—Average consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4237 mmLength4077 mm
1679 mmWidth1751 mm
1432 mmHeight1604 mm
1197 KgWeight1241 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2489 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 ZAZ Chance and 2012 Ford B-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ Chance leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…