DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 ZAZ Chance vs 2012 Dacia Dokker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ Chance

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakeDacia
ChanceModelDokker
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h15,9 s
172 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
85 HPPower75 HP
130 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4237 mmLength4363 mm
1679 mmWidth1751 mm
1432 mmHeight1814 mm
1197 KgWeight1205 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 ZAZ Chance and 2012 Dacia Dokker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ Chance leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…