DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 ZAZ Chance vs 2009 Perodua Kenari Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakePerodua
ChanceModelKenari
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
162 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement989 cc
70 HPPower56 HP
108 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size155/65 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4074 mmLength3460 mm
1678 mmWidth1475 mm
1432 mmHeight1665 mm
1182 KgWeight845 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 ZAZ Chance and 2009 Perodua Kenari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…