E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1972 ZAZ 966 vs 1993 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 100

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 9 points.

51.5–60.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZ 966SpecificationAudi 100
ZAZMakeAudi
966Model100
1972Model year1993
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

ZAZ 966SpecificationAudi 100
—0–100 km/h10,1 s
0 km/hTop speed204 km/h
887 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
27 HPPower137 HP
52 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

ZAZ 966SpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

ZAZ 966SpecificationAudi 100
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15

Dimensions

ZAZ 966SpecificationAudi 100
3730 mmLength4790 mm
1570 mmWidth1777 mm
1400 mmHeight1431 mm
—Weight1370 Kg
2160 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1972 ZAZ 966 and 1993 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 9 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1974 Audi 50VSImage unavailableAudi 50 vs ZAZ 9661974 and 1972 model years

Comments are loading…