DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 ZAZ 1140 vs 2000 Chevrolet Metro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Metro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakeChevrolet
1140ModelMetro
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

148 km/hTop speed145 km/h
993 ccEngine displacement993 cc
54 HPPower56 HP
0 NmTorque78 Nm
—Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank39 lt
—Urban consumption5,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13STyre size155/80 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3708 mmLength3790 mm
1554 mmWidth1590 mm
1410 mmHeight1390 mm
727 KgWeight860 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 ZAZ 1140 and 2000 Chevrolet Metro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Metro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…