DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 ZAZ 1125 vs 1993 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Storm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZ 1125SpecificationGeo Storm
ZAZMakeGeo
1125ModelStorm
1993Model year1993
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

ZAZ 1125SpecificationGeo Storm
—0–100 km/h12,4 s
148 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1091 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
63 HPPower130 HP
80 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

ZAZ 1125SpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

ZAZ 1125SpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13STyre size205/50 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

ZAZ 1125SpecificationGeo Storm
3708 mmLength4150 mm
1554 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1300 mm
727 KgWeight1010 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 ZAZ 1125 and 1993 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…