DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 ZAZ 1105 vs 2004 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakeVolkswagen
1105ModelPolo
2006Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
148 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
58 HPPower54 HP
90 NmTorque106 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,8 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3900 mmLength3897 mm
1676 mmWidth1650 mm
1600 mmHeight1465 mm
760 KgWeight980 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 ZAZ 1105 and 2004 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…