DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 ZAZ 1103 vs 1998 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 1103

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakeRenault
1103ModelKangoo
2000Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

17,4 s0–100 km/h17,2 s
147 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
58 HPPower58 HP
90 NmTorque93 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption8,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R14 C
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3980 mmLength3995 mm
1564 mmWidth1663 mm
1425 mmHeight1827 mm
790 KgWeight1020 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 ZAZ 1103 and 1998 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 1103 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…