DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 ZAZ 1102 vs 2003 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZ 1102SpecificationNissan AD
ZAZMakeNissan
1102ModelAD
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

ZAZ 1102SpecificationNissan AD
151 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
58 HPPower100 HP
90 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

ZAZ 1102SpecificationNissan AD
PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank50 lt

Transmission & Chassis

ZAZ 1102SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
155/70 R13Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

ZAZ 1102SpecificationNissan AD
3708 mmLength4370 mm
1564 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1475 mm
745 KgWeight—
2320 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 ZAZ 1102 and 2003 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…