DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 ZAZ 1102 vs 2003 Holden Cruze Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Cruze

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakeHolden
1102ModelCruze
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

151 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1490 cc
58 HPPower100 HP
90 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank41 lt
—Urban consumption7,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
155/70 R13Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3708 mmLength3625 mm
1564 mmWidth1640 mm
1410 mmHeight1605 mm
745 KgWeight1000 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 ZAZ 1102 and 2003 Holden Cruze approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Cruze leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…