DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 ZAZ 1102 vs 2004 Lancia Musa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Musa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZ 1102SpecificationLancia Musa
ZAZMakeLancia
1102ModelMusa
2003Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

ZAZ 1102SpecificationLancia Musa
—0–100 km/h12,5 s
148 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1091 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
53 HPPower90 HP
80 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

ZAZ 1102SpecificationLancia Musa
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
39 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

ZAZ 1102SpecificationLancia Musa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13STyre size195/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

ZAZ 1102SpecificationLancia Musa
3708 mmLength3985 mm
1554 mmWidth1698 mm
1410 mmHeight1688 mm
727 KgWeight1200 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2508 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 ZAZ 1102 and 2004 Lancia Musa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Musa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…