2000 • ZAZ
1102
ZAZ 1102 1.1 (53 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 ZAZ 1102 vs 1997 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.2 (45 Hp) 1997Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
ZAZ 1102
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
ZAZ 1102SpecificationOpel Combo
ZAZMakeOpel
1102ModelCombo
2000Model year1997
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats2
3Doors3
Performance
ZAZ 1102SpecificationOpel Combo
148 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1091 ccEngine displacement1195 cc
53 HPPower45 HP
80 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
ZAZ 1102SpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
155/70 R13STyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
ZAZ 1102SpecificationOpel Combo
3708 mmLength4230 mm
1554 mmWidth1686 mm
1410 mmHeight1805 mm
727 KgWeight1065 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2480 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 ZAZ 1102 and 1997 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, ZAZ 1102 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableAudi A2 vs ZAZ 11022000 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableZAZ 1102 vs ZAZ 11021999 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableSuzuki Cultus vs ZAZ 11021999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableZAZ 1125 vs ZAZ 11021999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableZAZ 1140 vs ZAZ 11021999 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…