DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Zastava Yugo vs 1999 Tofas Siena Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Zastava Yugo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZastavaMakeTofas
YugoModelSiena
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
160 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1372 ccEngine displacement1372 cc
71 HPPower71 HP
106 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3930 mmLength4100 mm
1660 mmWidth1626 mm
1410 mmHeight1445 mm
960 KgWeight1025 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Zastava Yugo and 1999 Tofas Siena approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…