DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Zastava Yugo vs 2006 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Zastava Yugo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZastavaMakeOpel
YugoModelCombo
2006Model year2006
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
155 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
68 HPPower70 HP
100 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3540 mmLength4322 mm
1548 mmWidth1684 mm
1390 mmHeight1801 mm
855 KgWeight1325 Kg
2150 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Zastava Yugo and 2006 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…