DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Zastava Yugo vs 2002 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Zastava Yugo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZastavaMakeCitroen
YugoModelC3
2001Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
155 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1302 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
65 HPPower68 HP
98 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
32 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption5,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3490 mmLength3850 mm
1540 mmWidth1667 mm
1340 mmHeight1529 mm
840 KgWeight1022 Kg
2150 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Zastava Yugo and 2002 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…