2000 • Zastava
Yugo
Zastava Yugo 1.3 (103 A) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Zastava Yugo vs 1997 Rover Maestro Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Rover
Maestro
Rover Maestro 1.3 (69 Hp) 1997Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Zastava Yugo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Zastava YugoSpecificationRover Maestro
ZastavaMakeRover
YugoModelMaestro
2000Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Zastava YugoSpecificationRover Maestro
15,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
157 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1290 ccEngine displacement1275 cc
68 HPPower69 HP
100 NmTorque102 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Zastava YugoSpecificationRover Maestro
PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Zastava YugoSpecificationRover Maestro
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
165/70 R13Tyre size155/80 R13 79 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Zastava YugoSpecificationRover Maestro
3930 mmLength4000 mm
1660 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1430 mm
910 KgWeight925 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2510 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Zastava Yugo and 1997 Rover Maestro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…