DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Zastava Yugo vs 2000 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZastavaMakeRover
YugoModelMini MK
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
155 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1116 ccEngine displacement1274 cc
54 HPPower50 HP
78 NmTorque89 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank34 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
145 R13Tyre size145/70 R12
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3490 mmLength3050 mm
1540 mmWidth1410 mm
1340 mmHeight1350 mm
790 KgWeight645 Kg
2150 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Zastava Yugo and 2000 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…